<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital Wedding Photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.omniimages.com/2006/10/digital-wedding-photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.omniimages.com/2006/10/digital-wedding-photography/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 02:17:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christina</title>
		<link>http://www.omniimages.com/2006/10/digital-wedding-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-3040</link>
		<dc:creator>Christina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 02:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omniimages.com/2006/10/digital-wedding-photography/#comment-3040</guid>
		<description>The absolute cheapest you can get away with is a Canon 350D or a Nikon D50. And whichever you get, you&#039;ll need 2 of them. (As a pro, you need a backup for every piece of essential gear. No matter what item malfunctions, you have to keep on shooting!)
One step up, and you can get the Canon 30D in combination with a Canon 350D backup, or a Nikon D70/ D200 in combination with a D50/ D70 backup body.
If money is no object, get 2 Canon 1DsMk2&#039;s or 2 Nikon D2X&#039;s.
For the lenses, you&#039;ll want a 70-200mm zoom for candids, something like a 17-55mm zoom as your workhorse, plus maybe a few f/1.4 or f/1.8 primes. Some photographers like to also throw in a fish eye lens. (Again, double up on ranges you can&#039;t do without.)
Add 2 flash units, a ton of batteries, a tripod, plenty of memory cards, a hefty carrying bag, software (Photoshop with some plugins and perhaps Capture One), and a few other odds and ends, and your set.
Your looking at a total price of, ummm... $3000 for a budget setup and $7000+ for anything decent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The absolute cheapest you can get away with is a Canon 350D or a Nikon D50. And whichever you get, you&#039;ll need 2 of them. (As a pro, you need a backup for every piece of essential gear. No matter what item malfunctions, you have to keep on shooting!)<br />
One step up, and you can get the Canon 30D in combination with a Canon 350D backup, or a Nikon D70/ D200 in combination with a D50/ D70 backup body.<br />
If money is no object, get 2 Canon 1DsMk2&#039;s or 2 Nikon D2X&#039;s.<br />
For the lenses, you&#039;ll want a 70-200mm zoom for candids, something like a 17-55mm zoom as your workhorse, plus maybe a few f/1.4 or f/1.8 primes. Some photographers like to also throw in a fish eye lens. (Again, double up on ranges you can&#039;t do without.)<br />
Add 2 flash units, a ton of batteries, a tripod, plenty of memory cards, a hefty carrying bag, software (Photoshop with some plugins and perhaps Capture One), and a few other odds and ends, and your set.<br />
Your looking at a total price of, ummm&#8230; $3000 for a budget setup and $7000+ for anything decent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThinaDoukas</title>
		<link>http://www.omniimages.com/2006/10/digital-wedding-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-3030</link>
		<dc:creator>ThinaDoukas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 20:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omniimages.com/2006/10/digital-wedding-photography/#comment-3030</guid>
		<description>Hi there.. like your style.. good use of available light.. cheers from Thina Doukas Photography in Sydney</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there.. like your style.. good use of available light.. cheers from Thina Doukas Photography in Sydney</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cedykeman1</title>
		<link>http://www.omniimages.com/2006/10/digital-wedding-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-3042</link>
		<dc:creator>cedykeman1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 18:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omniimages.com/2006/10/digital-wedding-photography/#comment-3042</guid>
		<description>In my personal opinion, DSLR for the service and the RZ67 for the formal shots, portraits etc...

.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my personal opinion, DSLR for the service and the RZ67 for the formal shots, portraits etc&#8230;</p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boca</title>
		<link>http://www.omniimages.com/2006/10/digital-wedding-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-3041</link>
		<dc:creator>boca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 16:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omniimages.com/2006/10/digital-wedding-photography/#comment-3041</guid>
		<description>The cheapest and best would either be a Nikon D50 or a Nikon D70s (if the Nikon D70 is no longer available anywhere).

Some snippets from the D50 conclusion:

&quot;Unlike Canon when they produced the EOS 300D (Digital Rebel) Nikon chose not to cripple their affordable digital SLR. Instead the D50 while lacking some of the D70&#039;s features doesn&#039;t compromise performance or photographic flexibility, most important for first time buyers who (surely) the manufacturers hope will progress to a more expensive D-SLR later.&quot;

&amp;

&quot;The nicest thing about the D50 however is that it just feels right, build wise it&#039;s a step above the Canon EOS 350D and Pentax *ist DS, it&#039;s also not too small, I&#039;m all for making cameras lighter but there&#039;s a limit as to how small you can make an SLR before the hand grip feels cramped and controls begin to get in the way. The D50 feels as responsive as any film camera and is a pleasure to shoot with. The only change I would make would probably be a larger viewfinder view (like that of the Pentax *ist DS).

I&#039;m quite happy to give the D50 our highest rating, Highly Recommended, there&#039;s little to dislike and for anyone looking for an affordable digital SLR it has to be seriously considered. My only advice would be to research lenses and decide if you want to go with the Kit or spend a little more on a slightly better lens.&quot;


The following links will give you a guidline as to price and say a little something about lenses.

Nikon D50

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond50/

Nikon D70s (Just some info not a full review)
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0504/05042003nikond70s.asp

And not to be completly biased.
The site also reviews the 350D that someone else has mentioned.


350D
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos350d/

From the conclusion:

&quot;when we reviewed the EOS 300D we were disappointed that they had chosen to effectively cripple it by &#039;coding out&#039; certain features such as metering mode, AF mode, flash exposure compensation, flash sync curtain, mirror lock-up etc. These features were removed in software and it wasn&#039;t long before hackers began to restore them in the form of unofficial firmware updates. Thus we should remember that quite a few of the &#039;new features&#039; available on this camera are there just because they&#039;ve not been removed.

We did have some control issues too, I was surprised to see settings such as ISO, metering, AF mode and white balance moved from the status LCD to the LCD monitor (which means you have to be able to see it to make changes) and with the requirement of an extra press of the SET button to make changes stick. Lets hope a firmware update can take care of that. We were also disappointed with the &#039;new&#039; Kit lens, it effectively cripples the potential of the 350D with softness and ghosting at small apertures, do yourself a favour and go for the body only option along with a good lens (the EF-S 17-85 mm IS is good but expensive).&quot;

Though remember the choice of DSLR is also that of personal choice so try and give whichever cameras you are considering a trial run. Also remember not only does the Body (camera) make a difference but also the choice of lens.

Good luck in your choice.

PS

As I am sure you are aware the Cybershots &amp; Powershots are not DSLRs.

PPS

The KODAK P850 is also not a DSLR.
People he asked about DSLR&#039;s not any old digital camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cheapest and best would either be a Nikon D50 or a Nikon D70s (if the Nikon D70 is no longer available anywhere).</p>
<p>Some snippets from the D50 conclusion:</p>
<p>&quot;Unlike Canon when they produced the EOS 300D (Digital Rebel) Nikon chose not to cripple their affordable digital SLR. Instead the D50 while lacking some of the D70&#039;s features doesn&#039;t compromise performance or photographic flexibility, most important for first time buyers who (surely) the manufacturers hope will progress to a more expensive D-SLR later.&quot;</p>
<p>&amp;</p>
<p>&quot;The nicest thing about the D50 however is that it just feels right, build wise it&#039;s a step above the Canon EOS 350D and Pentax *ist DS, it&#039;s also not too small, I&#039;m all for making cameras lighter but there&#039;s a limit as to how small you can make an SLR before the hand grip feels cramped and controls begin to get in the way. The D50 feels as responsive as any film camera and is a pleasure to shoot with. The only change I would make would probably be a larger viewfinder view (like that of the Pentax *ist DS).</p>
<p>I&#039;m quite happy to give the D50 our highest rating, Highly Recommended, there&#039;s little to dislike and for anyone looking for an affordable digital SLR it has to be seriously considered. My only advice would be to research lenses and decide if you want to go with the Kit or spend a little more on a slightly better lens.&quot;</p>
<p>The following links will give you a guidline as to price and say a little something about lenses.</p>
<p>Nikon D50</p>
<p>http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond50/</p>
<p>Nikon D70s (Just some info not a full review)<br />
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0504/05042003nikond70s.asp</p>
<p>And not to be completly biased.<br />
The site also reviews the 350D that someone else has mentioned.</p>
<p>350D<br />
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos350d/</p>
<p>From the conclusion:</p>
<p>&quot;when we reviewed the EOS 300D we were disappointed that they had chosen to effectively cripple it by &#039;coding out&#039; certain features such as metering mode, AF mode, flash exposure compensation, flash sync curtain, mirror lock-up etc. These features were removed in software and it wasn&#039;t long before hackers began to restore them in the form of unofficial firmware updates. Thus we should remember that quite a few of the &#039;new features&#039; available on this camera are there just because they&#039;ve not been removed.</p>
<p>We did have some control issues too, I was surprised to see settings such as ISO, metering, AF mode and white balance moved from the status LCD to the LCD monitor (which means you have to be able to see it to make changes) and with the requirement of an extra press of the SET button to make changes stick. Lets hope a firmware update can take care of that. We were also disappointed with the &#039;new&#039; Kit lens, it effectively cripples the potential of the 350D with softness and ghosting at small apertures, do yourself a favour and go for the body only option along with a good lens (the EF-S 17-85 mm IS is good but expensive).&quot;</p>
<p>Though remember the choice of DSLR is also that of personal choice so try and give whichever cameras you are considering a trial run. Also remember not only does the Body (camera) make a difference but also the choice of lens.</p>
<p>Good luck in your choice.</p>
<p>PS</p>
<p>As I am sure you are aware the Cybershots &amp; Powershots are not DSLRs.</p>
<p>PPS</p>
<p>The KODAK P850 is also not a DSLR.<br />
People he asked about DSLR&#039;s not any old digital camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason P</title>
		<link>http://www.omniimages.com/2006/10/digital-wedding-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-3039</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 19:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omniimages.com/2006/10/digital-wedding-photography/#comment-3039</guid>
		<description>It depends on the package that you purchase.  Most photographers will charge a fee for the images on a cd.  But not all do.  Mine isn&#039;t charging me for it.  You have to negotiate that in the beginning.  Remember, EVERYTHING is negotiable when you&#039;re getting married.  Tell the photographer what you want to spend and what you want to get for it.  Normally they&#039;ll agree, maybe with a little negotations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It depends on the package that you purchase.  Most photographers will charge a fee for the images on a cd.  But not all do.  Mine isn&#039;t charging me for it.  You have to negotiate that in the beginning.  Remember, EVERYTHING is negotiable when you&#039;re getting married.  Tell the photographer what you want to spend and what you want to get for it.  Normally they&#039;ll agree, maybe with a little negotations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: funniq</title>
		<link>http://www.omniimages.com/2006/10/digital-wedding-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-3029</link>
		<dc:creator>funniq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 18:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omniimages.com/2006/10/digital-wedding-photography/#comment-3029</guid>
		<description>Great stuff ... thanks ...

Love you softbox for your speedlight. Is there also something like that for the Nikon&#039;s speedlight SB900 that you know?

Thanks in advance.

Cheers, andré from Holland</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff &#8230; thanks &#8230;</p>
<p>Love you softbox for your speedlight. Is there also something like that for the Nikon&#8217;s speedlight SB900 that you know?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance.</p>
<p>Cheers, andré from Holland</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lornee80</title>
		<link>http://www.omniimages.com/2006/10/digital-wedding-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-3036</link>
		<dc:creator>lornee80</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 15:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omniimages.com/2006/10/digital-wedding-photography/#comment-3036</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think there really is a &quot;best&quot; camera for anything. People should realize that the lens makes a lot of difference and is just as important a consideration as the camera body.

I also agree with the recommendations above. The Olympus E Series cameras are quite good. You may want to get the larger cameras like the E510 or E500, and stay away from the E410. This is because when you attach heavier lens to the camera body it will be unbalanced if you choose a smaller lighter body. You should also look into the Nikon D80 or the Canon 30D. They are also very nice cameras, and they look professional, which means your clients will trust you to take their pictures.

When choosing a lens, don&#039;t skimp on the quality. For instance, if you are going with Olympus I recommend the 14-54mm F2.8-3.5 lens which retails for about $400. This lens is one of the best quality to price lens available. You need to get lens which have a large maximum aperture because you will mostly be shooting indoors. Also a large aperture will give you good blurring of background for portraits. You should also buy at least one prime lens. A prime lens gets you sharper images and normally have a large maximum aperture like F2.8. Consider getting the 50mm F2.0 lens which is great as your main portrait lens.

There are also &quot;accessories&quot; (more like fundamental gear) that you need to consider like a tripod, flash units, spare batteries (at least two extra for backup purposes), another camera body (again for backup if the first one fails), portable lighting units, a laptop (for mobile work), etc.. It&#039;s going to be costly all the equipment you need to purchase but that&#039;s the startup recommendations you need to look at.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t think there really is a &quot;best&quot; camera for anything. People should realize that the lens makes a lot of difference and is just as important a consideration as the camera body.</p>
<p>I also agree with the recommendations above. The Olympus E Series cameras are quite good. You may want to get the larger cameras like the E510 or E500, and stay away from the E410. This is because when you attach heavier lens to the camera body it will be unbalanced if you choose a smaller lighter body. You should also look into the Nikon D80 or the Canon 30D. They are also very nice cameras, and they look professional, which means your clients will trust you to take their pictures.</p>
<p>When choosing a lens, don&#039;t skimp on the quality. For instance, if you are going with Olympus I recommend the 14-54mm F2.8-3.5 lens which retails for about $400. This lens is one of the best quality to price lens available. You need to get lens which have a large maximum aperture because you will mostly be shooting indoors. Also a large aperture will give you good blurring of background for portraits. You should also buy at least one prime lens. A prime lens gets you sharper images and normally have a large maximum aperture like F2.8. Consider getting the 50mm F2.0 lens which is great as your main portrait lens.</p>
<p>There are also &quot;accessories&quot; (more like fundamental gear) that you need to consider like a tripod, flash units, spare batteries (at least two extra for backup purposes), another camera body (again for backup if the first one fails), portable lighting units, a laptop (for mobile work), etc.. It&#039;s going to be costly all the equipment you need to purchase but that&#039;s the startup recommendations you need to look at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proudmama</title>
		<link>http://www.omniimages.com/2006/10/digital-wedding-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-3038</link>
		<dc:creator>proudmama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 08:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omniimages.com/2006/10/digital-wedding-photography/#comment-3038</guid>
		<description>Make sure sister is prepared to receive less than stunning photos of her big day.  Although you may do a decent job there will still be things that would be done better using a professional.  Also think of this:  As the event photographer you will not be participating in the festivities as a sister and honored guest.  You will be working.  All day.  No time to chat with sis and family members.  Also family members and other people may not take you seriously as the real photographer, so you may find it difficult to take control when you need to.

Anyway, here is a link:

http://www.rokkorfiles.com/Wedding101-page1.html

Also www.photo.net, look for the beginners section in the wedding and event forum.

If you decide to do it, be sure to get backup equipment of some sort.  Cameras do fail, so you need to be able to continue shooting.  I have given many tips to first time shooters, just look at some of my past answers and you will find my sage advice repeated many times.  Good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Make sure sister is prepared to receive less than stunning photos of her big day.  Although you may do a decent job there will still be things that would be done better using a professional.  Also think of this:  As the event photographer you will not be participating in the festivities as a sister and honored guest.  You will be working.  All day.  No time to chat with sis and family members.  Also family members and other people may not take you seriously as the real photographer, so you may find it difficult to take control when you need to.</p>
<p>Anyway, here is a link:</p>
<p>http://www.rokkorfiles.com/Wedding101-page1.html</p>
<p>Also http://www.photo.net, look for the beginners section in the wedding and event forum.</p>
<p>If you decide to do it, be sure to get backup equipment of some sort.  Cameras do fail, so you need to be able to continue shooting.  I have given many tips to first time shooters, just look at some of my past answers and you will find my sage advice repeated many times.  Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fyerfytr</title>
		<link>http://www.omniimages.com/2006/10/digital-wedding-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-3027</link>
		<dc:creator>fyerfytr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 04:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omniimages.com/2006/10/digital-wedding-photography/#comment-3027</guid>
		<description>Awesome video, thanks for posting. I have my first wedding next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome video, thanks for posting. I have my first wedding next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corky252</title>
		<link>http://www.omniimages.com/2006/10/digital-wedding-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-3032</link>
		<dc:creator>corky252</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omniimages.com/2006/10/digital-wedding-photography/#comment-3032</guid>
		<description>Just what I have been looking for. Very helpful. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just what I have been looking for. Very helpful. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

